Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
[x]

deviantART

 
About Me Member Political Writer UnvalancedMale/United States Recent Activity Deviant for 2 Years
Needs Premium Membership
Statistics 6 Deviations
185 Comments
3,727 Pageviews

Newest

Fasting...

Fri Jun 12, 2009, 12:02 PM
Experimenting with a fast since yesterday. I have been drinking a "tea" which I'm making by pouring hot water over clove and cinnamon. (It tasted good when I started. Now it just tastes like soap.)

I've learned some interesting things. First, fasting is -not- painful, at least not yet, or not for me, or maybe if you drink plenty of fluids. And also, I haven't gotten -hungry- yet. At least not in any meaningful sense of the word. I'm curious to know how long it would take me to get hungry at this point, having discovered that my primary motivation for eating is, in fact, boredom, as my desire to eat only appears when I have nothing to do. (I bought myself some good books, and I'm fine now.) I'm starting to feel my energy wane, and am contemplating combating that with some sugar-free energy drinks, but I suspect that might have adverse effects on me without having eaten. (The only problem with having bought good books is that I am now also running on a deficiency of sleep. We'll see if the combination makes me delirious.)

I'm -not- stupid enough to go running right now, having gone on an unintentional fast in the past as a result of staying with somebody who made absolutely terrible food (they lie when they say if you get hungry enough you'll eat anything, by the way - I don't think there is a misery on the planet sufficient to make me eat her collard greens), and having nearly collapsed when I tried to go biking after a week of that.

  • Eating: Nothing!

deviantID

No deviantID yet.

Devious Info

  • Interests: Politics, economics, philosophy, theoretical physics - just about anything, really.
  • Favourite poet or writer: Ayn Rand
  • Operating System: XP

deviantART Community Board

[x]

Comments


:iconsonicbutterfly:
Long time no see, you.

--
"THOSE WHO WOULD GIVE UP THE LIBERTY OF NOT FOLLOWING SONICBUTTERFLY'S RULES FOR THE SECURITY OF MEETING HER EXPECTATIONS DESERVE NEITHER!" - *JupiterWave
:iconunvalanced:
Heh, yeah.

A friend (my best friend, actually) from high school that I've been looking for for years called me a couple months ago out of the blue, and I've been caught up in... er... her, of late.

--
Why is it people who speak of brotherly love always seem to favour the Cain-with-Abel approach to the matter?
:iconouroboroscobra:
Oh look, you're back.

--
Vive la révolution libertaire, mon ~TBSchemer!

Thomas Paine wrote "The Rights of Man," not "The Privileges of Law Abiding Citizens That Aren't Brown People or Praying to Allah"
:iconunvalanced:
No, not really.

--
Why is it people who speak of brotherly love always seem to favour the Cain-with-Abel approach to the matter?
:icontbschemer:
It's been awhile since I felt like I could say this about anyone, but I think your thoughtful ideas and calm contemplation bring a great deal of rationality to a politics forum which is otherwise in chaos.

--
Journal for a Free Society: [link]

A scientist cannot be dismissive of new or unpopular ideas, for it is investigation of that which has not been considered which leads to discovery and understanding.
:iconunvalanced:
Thank you.

Probably won't stick around too much longer before I skip out for another couple of months. There isn't really a whole lot of challenge there right now (possibly because of the summer, possibly because I'm in an unusually lucid state of existence at the moment), and I pretty much exist to challenge my own ideas.

--
Why is it people who speak of brotherly love always seem to favour the Cain-with-Abel approach to the matter?
:iconbeautiful-insanity:
AYN RAND? reallllly? Anarcho-Capitalist....?

--
DAPoliticalForum member woohoo! :D
:iconunvalanced:
Nah; minarchist. Anarcho-capitalism is just inviting a different kind of government to rule you.

--
Why is it people who speak of brotherly love always seem to favour the Cain-with-Abel approach to the matter?
:iconbeautiful-insanity:
So.. a form of libertarianism, or classical liberalism even..?

--
DAPoliticalForum member woohoo! :D
:iconunvalanced:
Classical liberalism, yep. I believe in a government - but one whose sole duty is to act as a repository for society's violence, to keep violence, inasmuch as possible, contained within it. (And any deviation from that duty is a failure in that duty, as its sole power is to release some of that violence for its ends.)

--
Why is it people who speak of brotherly love always seem to favour the Cain-with-Abel approach to the matter?

Site Map