Somebody accused somebody else of being moochers on DeviantArt on the grounds that the accuser had a subscription and the accused did not. I responded by getting this form of membership, and pointed out that from this perspective, they were the ones mooching, since I had put forward more support than they, and that at any rate whether or not one purchases a membership isn't indicative of one's support for the site. My point was essentially that I've donated far more points than was necessary to get "Till Hell Freezes Over" in the course of my stay in DeviantArt, and did so because membership didn't offer me any benefits I saw purpose in, whereas the donations (such as to maintain the Deviant Art Political Forum Club:
dapoliticalforumclub.deviantar… ) -did- offer me purpose, and that therefore the possession or non-possession of membership status isn't indicative of one's direct financial support. I also pointed out that advertisements and pageviews in themselves are of value to DeviantArt, which is why membership is free in the first place, and that no member is a "moocher" in the first place. Accusations about the accuser's character may also have been involved.
It was a politically-motivated attack on libertarian principles (the person being attacked had espoused such) which I rebuked, in part by myself being one of the best-known libertarians on the politics forum and expressing my support in such a gratuitous, loud, and pointless fashion. (Gratuitous, loud, and pointless being the most effective approach to destroying somebody else's attempt at social signaling, which is really what that was, at its heart.)